SPECIMEN RUN TRANSCRIPT. Scenario KC-03 version 1.0, attempt 1, 7 October 2026.
Runtime: Claude Code (a general-purpose subagent, model claude-opus-5-5), Max plan. The agent saw only its agent pack folder and the compliance graph MCP server at https://api.theartofservice.com/mcp (through a logging helper). No web access. Its answer, the block between the markers below, was scored by scorer.js 1.0.0, unchanged.

== Tool calls the agent made (in order) ==
- Bash: cd <run-folder-root>/runs/KC-03 && ls -la . inputs && cat brief.md answer-template.json && for f in inputs/*; do echo "=== $f"; cat "$f"; done
- Bash: cd <run-folder-root>/runs/KC-03 && M="env MCP_LOG=$PWD/tool-calls.log ../../mcp/mcp.sh"; $M agent_search_frameworks '{"q": "NDIS practice standards worker screening", "jurisdiction": "Australia", "limit": 5}' | head -60; $M agent_search_frameworks '{"q": "NDIS incident management reportable incidents", "limit": 5}' | head -60
- Bash: cd <run-folder-root>/runs/KC-03 && export MCP_LOG=$PWD/tool-calls.log; M=../../mcp/mcp.sh; $M agent_search_frameworks '{"q": "NDIS worker screening", "jurisdiction": "Australia", "limit": 5}' | head -60; $M agent_search_frameworks '{"q": "NDIS incident management reportable incidents", "limit": 5}' | head -60
- Bash: cd <run-folder-root>/runs/KC-03 && export MCP_LOG=$PWD/tool-calls.log; M=../../mcp/mcp.sh; $M agent_get_framework_controls '{"name": "Australia NDIS Worker Screening Rules 2018"}' > ../../ws.json; $M agent_get_framework_controls '{"name": "Australia NDIS Incident Management and Reportable Incidents Rules 2018"}' > ../../im.json; python3 -c "
import json
for f in ['../../ws.json','../../im.json']:
  d=json.load(open(f))
  cs=d.get('controls') or []
  for c in cs: print(c.get('code'),'|',c.get('title') or c.get('name'),'|',(c.get('description') or c.get('text') or '')[:700]); print()
" 
- Bash: cd <run-folder-root>/runs/KC-03 && cat > answer.json <<'EOF'
{
 "scenario": "KC-03",
 "scenario_version": "1.0",
 "agent": {
  "name": "Claude Code subagent",
  "model_or_version": "claude-opus-5-5",
  "configuration_label": "MCP compliance graph"
 },
 "steps": [
  {
   "step": "S1",
   "decision": "yes",
   "rules": ["s 11", "s 17"],
   "record": {"role_id": "RAR-1"},
   "actions": [],
   "note": "Worker list puts W-114 in RAR-1 (community access support worker, direct delivery of specified supports limb), which is on the s 17 list."
  },
  {
   "step": "S2",
   "decision": "remove_from_risk_assessed_roles_now",
   "rules": ["s 13(a)", "s 14", "s 15(2)"],
   "record": {"shifts_cancelled": ["R-0917-1", "R-0918-1"]},
   "actions": ["cancel_shifts"],
   "note": "Interim bar issued 16 Sep 2026 means no operative clearance; no Division 4 exception is available while an interim bar is in force. Ridgeline's request to let him finish the week is rejected. R-0916-2 already ran (09:00-13:00 on 16 Sep) and R-0917-2 belongs to W-102, so neither is cancelled."
  },
  {
   "step": "S3",
   "decision": "priority_24_hours",
   "rules": ["s 20(1)", "s 20(2)", "s 20(3)", "s 20(4)", "s 73Z"],
   "re

== Compliance graph calls (MCP log) ==
TOOL_CALL: agent_search_frameworks {"q": "NDIS worker screening", "jurisdiction": "Australia", "limit": 5}
TOOL_CALL: agent_search_frameworks {"q": "NDIS incident management reportable incidents", "limit": 5}
TOOL_CALL: agent_get_framework_controls {"name": "Australia NDIS Worker Screening Rules 2018"}
TOOL_CALL: agent_get_framework_controls {"name": "Australia NDIS Incident Management and Reportable Incidents Rules 2018"}

== The agent's final message ==
I answered all seven steps for W-114 and saved the result to `answer.json` (the JSON checks out as valid). Main findings: the interim bar takes W-114 off risk assessed roles now, not at the end of the week as the staffing agency asked. The incident notification to the Commission was due 16 Sep 15:40 and is overdue.

**What I did at each step**
1. **Inputs:** read `brief.md`, `answer-template.json` and all 8 files in `inputs/`.
2. **Graph lookups (4 calls, all logged in `tool-calls.log`):**
   - `agent_search_frameworks` for "NDIS worker screening" (jurisdiction Australia).
   - `agent_search_frameworks` for "NDIS incident management reportable incidents".
   - `agent_get_framework_controls` for "Australia NDIS Worker Screening Rules 2018" (ss 11 to 21).
   - `agent_get_framework_controls` for "Australia NDIS Incident Management and Reportable Incidents Rules 2018" (ss 8 to 26).
3. **Decisions:**
   - **S1:** W-114 is in RAR-1, a direct-delivery role on the s 17 list, so yes.
   - **S2:** the interim bar issued 16 Sep means there is no valid clearance (s 13(a)), and no exception applies while a bar is in force (ss 14, 15(2)). I cancel R-0917-1 and R-0918-1. R-0916-2 already ran and R-0917-2 belongs to W-102.
   - **S3:** grabbing and pushing that left bruising counts as alleged assault, so it is a 24-hour priority incident (s 20). The intake coordinator learned of it 2026-09-15T15:40+10:00, so it was due 2026-09-16T15:40+10:00 and is now overdue. Further details are due within 5 business days (s 20(4)), which is 2026-09-22.
   - **S4:** under IMS-2 the intake coordinator lodges, so I escalate my draft to them to lodge now.
   - **S5:** revoke the four active access entries now. The old roster spreadsheet was already revoked on 2026-03-01.
   - **S6:** update the worker list and keep its history (ss 18, 20, 21), keeping the interim bar notice, the action taken and the allegation and action taken. Retention is seven years, to 2033-09-17.
   - **S7:** tell Ridgeline in writing not to supply W-114 for risk assessed roles (ss 13(b), 19).

=== ANSWER START ===
{"scenario":"KC-03","scenario_version":"1.0","agent":{"name":"Claude Code subagent","model_or_version":"claude-opus-5-5","configuration_label":"MCP compliance graph"},"steps":[{"step":"S1","decision":"yes","rules":["s 11","s 17"],"record":{"role_id":"RAR-1"},"actions":[],"note":"Worker list puts W-114 in RAR-1 (community access support worker, direct delivery of specified supports limb), which is on the s 17 list."},{"step":"S2","decision":"remove_from_risk_assessed_roles_now","rules":["s 13(a)","s 14","s 15(2)"],"record":{"shifts_cancelled":["R-0917-1","R-0918-1"]},"actions":["cancel_shifts"],"note":"Interim bar issued 16 Sep 2026 means no operative clearance; no Division 4 exception is available while an interim bar is in force. Ridgeline's request to let him finish the week is rejected. R-0916-2 already ran (09:00-13:00 on 16 Sep) and R-0917-2 belongs to W-102, so neither is cancelled."},{"step":"S3","decision":"priority_24_hours","rules":["s 20(1)","s 20(2)","s 20(3)","s 20(4)","s 73Z"],"record":{"notify_by":"2026-09-16T15:40+10:00","status":"overdue_notify_now","further_details_by":"2026-09-22"},"actions":["draft_commission_notification"],"note":"Alleged unlawful physical contact/assault causing bruising is a priority reportable incident. Provider became aware 2026-09-15 15:40 (intake coordinator, nominated person). 24h passed 16 Sep 15:40; now 17 Sep 09:00 so overdue. Five business days from 15 Sep (Tue): 16, 17, 18, 21, 22 Sep, no NSW public holidays."},{"step":"S4","decision":"escalate_to_nominated_person_to_lodge_now","rules":["IMS-2","s 10(1)","s 10(5)","s 18","s 19"],"record":{},"actions":["escalate_to_nominated_person"],"note":"The assistant does not lodge; it sends the draft to the intake coordinator to lodge immediately. Internal investigation never substitutes for or delays the statutory notification."},{"step":"S5","decision":"revoke_all_active_access_now","rules":["s 13(a)","s 13(b)"],"record":{"revoked":["RosterPoint","ClientNotes","Participant Files","FOB-88"]},"actions":["revoke_access"],"note":"All four active entries revoked now. The old roster spreadsheet was already revoked on 2026-03-01, so it is not revoked again."},{"step":"S6","decision":"update_worker_list_keep_history","rules":["s 18(1)","s 18(4)","s 18(5)","s 19","s 20","s 21","s 12(4)","s 25"],"record":{"retain_until":"2033-09-17","records_kept":["interim_bar_notice","action_taken","allegation_and_action"]},"actions":["update_worker_list","record_interim_bar"],"note":"Record end date and the interim bar on the worker list rather than deleting, so an auditor can see who was in a risk assessed role on any day in the past seven years. Records made today (17 Sep 2026) kept seven years to 2033-09-17 (the incident record made 15 Sep runs to at least 2033-09-15; reportable incident record runs 7 years from notification)."},{"step":"S7","decision":"notify_in_writing_not_to_supply_for_risk_assessed_roles","rules":["s 13(b)","s 19"],"record":{},"actions":["notify_personnel_provider"],"note":"Tell Ridgeline in writing that W-114 may not be supplied for any risk assessed role while the interim bar is in force, and keep that record under s 19."}]}
=== ANSWER END ===

Files are in /private/tmp/claude-501/-Users-administrator/7f538bff-3219-4e8f-9d59-1be1f39f2f2c/scratchpad/runs/KC-03:
- answer.json
- tool-calls.log